The Gray Word

Monday, March 19, 2012

NFL Drafting vs College Recruiting

Les Miles one of the nations best recruiters
Wherever and however you are reading this today, thank you for making the Gray Area Matters Part of your day. I want to talk today about the difference between college recruiting and drafting players for the NFL. What surprises me most about college recruitment is the credit (or lack thereof) given to the coaches.  With the NFL draft, roughly 95% or more players come from the 120 FBS (division one) teams. Out of those, the NFL scouts and teams pick 7 players, and they end up with around 250 players total selected by the end. Most teams are concerned with players from round one to five actually becoming starters. But, in college, it’s a whole other story! You have 24 scholarships, and you are expected to make sure they all are legitimate players who will start at some point. A team can get away with a few players who stay on as back-ups, but for the most part, you sign a player to the school because a coach believes he will be a starter.  
Belichick is known relies more on veteran
free agents than on drafted players. 
My point is that college recruiting is much, much harder than selecting players for the draft. There are thousands of high schools across the country, and a potential college football player can come from just about anywhere. Not to mention, you are competing with those aforementioned other 119 teams just in the FBS! Add on top of that dealing with teenagers who struggle with decisions as we all did.  Also, a staggering number of commits never reach full potential because of lack of effort or of talent. Face it, sometimes players are only good in high school, much like some players are only good in college.

The difference in my mind is that in college if you have a poor recruiting year you can set your team back an entire season. In the NFL, it is very difficult for any team to completely miss in the draft. The information the NFL receives is much more accurate and reliable than what the college world is working with. The margin for error in the NFL may appear to be smaller but a team only adds seven players to its 53 man roster. While in college you add 24 players for a 72 man roster.  That means each year a college team adds and loses about a third of its roster year to year. 
Tommy Tubberville one of the best at getting the best
out of his players. 
The bottom line is that putting together a great recruiting class takes an all-around commitment from every one on a coaching staff. With many high school players trying to make it the next level, it takes tremendous effort to find the right ones for a team. I tip my hat to the coaches for that are able to do it year to year and build a solid program.  While the NFL may be the top level of the coaching world to some people, the best coaches in football just might be at the college level.  As always thank you for making this blog part of your day if you want to hear more from me you can always follow me on twitter @chrisgrayarea and don’t forget to check out the Facebook page for the latest updates! 

Wednesday, March 7, 2012

Bounty Shots

Wherever and however you are reading this today, thank you making the Gray Area Matters part of your day. This “Bounty” ordeal is getting way, way out of hand. By now most of you have heard about the Saints former defensive coordinator (now with the Rams) Gregg Williams placing bounties on star players. This broke on Friday and was an official NFL report. This is a huge deal because the year the Saints one the Super Bowl they knocked Kurt Warner (Cardinals) and Brett Favre (Vikings) out of the game. It is my opinion that any person with experience playing team sports wants to win. No one wants to permanently injure another player. However, knock them out of a game? Yes. You play harder when you are going against the best. Every person elevates their game when the stakes are at their highest. As I often quote, Herm Edwards said, “You play to win the game.”  

If that means you hit the best player a little harder, so be it. You want to slow them down any way you can. Those who say this is poor sportsmanship are the ones who crumble when the game is on the line. As a hockey player, I know people are going to take shots at me because I am good player, so I prepare for it. You prepare mentally and physically all week for your next opponent. Brett Favre doesn’t have a problem with it because he knows that is how the game is played. You don’t think every top player expect to get everyone’s best shot? They do. Example: my man, Sidney Crosby, comes back from almost a year off the ice and David Krejci goes right at him and nails him. This tested Sidney, and in this case, he was injured unfortunately. Ok, maybe that was a bad example. 

The point is that top players are going to be hit harder and tested more because they are the best. It is never going to stop. Let me be clear I am not for placing a “bounty” as in cash for knocking a player out. Incentives like sacks, touchdowns, goals, homeruns, etc. are acceptable.  Basically, I am ok with top players being pressed harder because it comes with the territory. If you have got a problem with it, run to a lesser league, for example Russia, like some NHL players (Radulov) or retire (Kurt Warner). 
My final thought for this whole “Bounty” shot idea is this. Trusts that 99% of all players do not want to hit someone and cause a long-term injury.  Money being passed for knocking players out of games is bad; no one will deny that. The professional leagues will monitor and take precautions to ensure player safety is the best it can be. Trust that the leagues and players will do the right thing with these sorts of situations. As always, thank you for making this blog of your day. Please be sure to follow me on twitter @chrisgrayarea and like the Chris Gray Area on Facebook